Bitzer and Edbauer have generally
contrasting philosophies on the concept of rhetoric. Bitzer’s rhetoric is
largely situational and is focused on three main aspects: the audience, the
exigence, and the constraints. An example of Bitzer’s rhetoric played out in
real life would be any professional sports team. The exigence is the players’
call to action to win the championship, the audience would be the fans that
support these teams, and the constraints would be factors such as injury and
opposing teams.
Edbauer, on the other hand,
believes that rhetoric should be seen as ecological rather than situational.
She believes that Bitzer’s rhetorical situation complicated the standard
‘sender-reciever’ public communication model. Edbaur’s rhetoric revolves around
the concept of exigence being a more complex of various audience and speaker
perceptions and institutional or material constraints. An example of this form
of rhetoric would be suggests that rhetorical context is always changing and
cannot be isolated to one particular audience, creator, or text. An example
that would demonstrate Edbauer’s rhetorical theory would be an old student
yearbook photo repurposed as a meme. Although the photo was originally taken to
create a lasting memory of the student, a new creator has taken the text and
used it in a manner to appeal to a new audience rather than its original
intended audience.
Although I comprehend both
theorists’ rhetorical ideologies, I think I agree with Edbauer’s definition of
rhetoric more than I do with bitzer’s. I believe that with the advances that
the digital age have brought, rhetoric is much less constrained to a sole
purpose. The ability to edit a photograph or alter a text and apply it to separate
audiences is much easier with the use of technology than it was before. I think
that because a message with one intention can be understood and used for a separate
intention, Bitzer’s standard rhetorical triangle type of philosophy is outdated
and no longer accurate. In the words of Edbauer, “the rhetorical situation is
part of an ongoing social flux”. Rhetorical context can be repurposed and used
to convey many different messages which leads me to find Edbauer’s rhetorical
ecology more relatable.
Jaime, I find it extremely interesting that you chose sports as a real life example for Bitzer. I would've never looked at Bitzer's rhetorical situation from this point of view but it definitely fits his theory of audience, exigence, and constraints. Also, the memes example of Edbaur is fitting as well. Any sort of image that is circutlated and changed can apply to Edbaurs ecology.
ReplyDelete