The artifacts
that I chose for journal two help teach us that rhetoric means something
different to each individual. Each person, be it author or audience, has their
own perspective shaped by their experiences and beliefs that are applied to
their understanding of rhetoric. For the most part, we understand what rhetoric
is when we see an obvious example, but where the line is drawn on what is
rhetoric and what isn’t is unclear and subjective. The example of the Women’s March
and one of my classmate’s example of MLK’s rhetoric during the Civil Rights
movement can be seen as rhetoric by Bitzer because the exigencies that caused
both events were so important and prominent. On the other hand, a eulogy would
not be considered rhetoric by Bitzer because the exigence and its response is
not usually important enough to facilitate a large change or movement. There is
a trend across their artifacts and my own, which is that rhetorical situations
are ones in which many people are involved and able to voice their opinions and
be heard. Examples of this kind of rhetoric include the Civil Rights movement,
the Women’s March, Facebook, and even a group message as long as it meets
certain criteria of the exigence.
From
Edbauer’s article, we gain an understanding of how important the role of
circulation and communication really are as it relates to rhetoric. Circulation
is key to successful rhetoric. For rhetoric to be as moving and impactful as it
can be, it must reach the audience it is intended to move, and the best way to
ensure this is through effective circulation. From Wysocki’s article, we can
conclude that the role of design influences audience by appealing to them in a
way that is visually pleasing or makes sense to the eyes. Design helps
facilitate circulation by making rhetoric something worth sharing by leaving a
lasting impression on it audience. The role of material affordances that
Gladwell discusses can also be linked back to circulation and design. The best
way to ensure circulation is to create multiple mediums each with their own
design and material affordances to reach multiple groups of people. Material
affordances allow us to organize, plan, and make notes in a way digital mediums
cannot, which helps aid circulation for printed media.
Many people, including myself, have only realized what the rhetoric means for themselves. It's refreshing to see that you've looked into what it may mean for the people around you.
ReplyDelete