In Rose's text, she addresses aspects of writing such as the site of the production, site of circulation, the image itself, and audiencing. The author also addresses technological, compositional and social modalities. To compare my map to her work, I would have to add that all writing has meaning and a message, and all writing has an audience. One thing that arguably I did not hit on was the social modalities. Lunsford argues that writing is conversational, and because of this there is a blurred line between the "giver" (writer) and the "receiver" (audience). Although I disagree with Lunsford, it would be of some benefit to include AUTHOR in my map. Before anything, before even being genuine, all writing comes from and author or authors. Shipka's piece focus' on the multimodality and rhetorical sensitivity of her assignment to her students. I don't agree that her presumed points apply to all writing, but I do believe that they apply to good writing. To compare to my map, maybe that I could add that all writing is VISUAL. Literally, with letters, and then in the fact that all writing paints a picture--even the writing in a text book. This is why making movies out of books is so popular.
In Rose's text, she addresses aspects of writing such as the site of the production, site of circulation, the image itself, and audiencing. The author also addresses technological, compositional and social modalities. To compare my map to her work, I would have to add that all writing has meaning and a message, and all writing has an audience. One thing that arguably I did not hit on was the social modalities.
ReplyDeleteLunsford argues that writing is conversational, and because of this there is a blurred line between the "giver" (writer) and the "receiver" (audience). Although I disagree with Lunsford, it would be of some benefit to include AUTHOR in my map. Before anything, before even being genuine, all writing comes from and author or authors.
Shipka's piece focus' on the multimodality and rhetorical sensitivity of her assignment to her students. I don't agree that her presumed points apply to all writing, but I do believe that they apply to good writing. To compare to my map, maybe that I could add that all writing is VISUAL. Literally, with letters, and then in the fact that all writing paints a picture--even the writing in a text book. This is why making movies out of books is so popular.