After reading Shipka, I feel like I could improve on the way this is delivered; I feel that this 2-D diagram could be something more exciting. However, I do feel like I captured the different processes of writing and how it can reach out and affect different readers. I think that I was able to capture Lunsford's rhetorical triangle fairly well, though in this map, I did not even think about the effect of technological advancements. Could that change the way a reader takes in a text? As far as Rose is concerned, I think that I captured the sites well on the surface level, but I could have gone even deeper into perhaps, again, how the audience interprets the text and the purpose of the writer.
After reading Shipka, I feel like I could improve on the way this is delivered; I feel that this 2-D diagram could be something more exciting. However, I do feel like I captured the different processes of writing and how it can reach out and affect different readers. I think that I was able to capture Lunsford's rhetorical triangle fairly well, though in this map, I did not even think about the effect of technological advancements. Could that change the way a reader takes in a text? As far as Rose is concerned, I think that I captured the sites well on the surface level, but I could have gone even deeper into perhaps, again, how the audience interprets the text and the purpose of the writer.
ReplyDelete