From what I understood in the Arolas’
text, bare repetition is exactly recreating something to a t or repeating a
tradition just like it has customarily been performed; for example, a Civil War
reenactment or Noh theatre. The Noh theatre style in Japan serves as an example
of bare repetition since the generations who have practiced it since the 1400s
have kept the Noh theatre culture so close to its roots and traditions. Training
to become a performer on the Noh stage today has remained virtually unchanged
since the start of the practice. Noh actors still begin training at a young age,
all roles stil wear masks, Noh actors still fulfill the positions of shite, waki, kyogen, and hayashi, and
Noh performance spaces all over Japan still maintain the traditional four sectioned
stage established in the fifteenth century.
An ethical assemblage, however,
sounds like a respectful remix where elements are taken from one assemblage and
applied to another with acknowledgement to the element(s)’ original assemblage.
Let’s look at the Broadway musical Into
the Woods. Stephen Sondheim combined the tales of various Grimm brothers’
characters and combined them into one universe, converging their paths and
stories while adding new elements. Sondheim pulls the characters’ names, central
story concepts, and even some of the brutality found in the original Brothers
Grimm fairy tales and plops them on stage, paying homage to the brothers and
creating structure with these consistencies but also adding a new dimension to the
stories with music and the intertwining of stories.
Hurtful assemblages should be
immediately acknowledged and an explanation about why the assemblage is hurtful
must be communicated to the creator as soon as possible. Sometimes people make
hurtful assemblages out of ignorance. Do FSU students realize they’re
culturally appropriating Seminole culture when they wear headdresses and
particular patterns of face paint to football games? Usually no, they just
think it’s something cute to wear to a sporting event. In reality, we must
recognize this action as taking an important aspect of another peoples’ culture,
in this case the Seminole people’s, and making it our own, disrespecting its significance
in Seminole culture as students purely use it for aesthetic. However, we must
be wary to not automatically assume any assemblage channeling a culture
different than that of the creator’s is harmful, as he or she may be adopting
those specific cultural aspects and applying them in a respectful manner.
Fair use would be applicable to
ethical assemblages, as they adopt ideas of other assemblages but communicate
these ideas in a different way or use them as a foundation for new ideas.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.