1.
The word “text” is the most essential because
all three terms relate to each other in the context of “text” in itself. Text
is the center of everything, always. It’s literally in the center of the
heart/triangle for that reason.
2.
I used a pen, a piece of paper, and a
highlighter. I don’t like to get extravagant to prove a simple point.
Sometimes, but not right now. I’d rather not overthink it and take too long
trying to prove a point that’s too hard to prove, which is essentially what
happened in my project 1.
3.
I stated in my blog that the three key terms
acted like a love triangle, all connected by text, therefore I drew a heart and
designed it like a triangle. Even if the audience doesn’t understand what a
love triangle is, they would understand that all the terms are connected and
that it’s in a shape of a heart. There is no preferred reading path for a
reason, since all three terms are connected to text in an equal way. I would
hope that the viewer doesn’t misinterpret the points of the heart, but that’s
one drawback from using a more metaphorical device instead of a straightforward
one like the initial triangle idea. I arranged it without order for the reason
of the viewer pulling which word they feel is more important to themselves
since I want that personal level of interpretation rather than being guided
along a path.
4.
I will probably integrate my theory into the e-portfolio
with an about page but without the drawing. I think the drawing is stupid but
not even in a brandable stupid that a possible employer would like. It’s just
bad. Describing it will make me sound smarter, like on my blog.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.