Journal 7 - Kelly Ramirez

My current definition for writing would be the beginning process of anything rhetorical. Writing would contain more of a theoretical approach that explains, or defines, a text. My definition of editing would be revising a text in order to better its purpose; or adapt it to fit better for its audience. Composing is the all-encompassing process that occurs when creating any rhetorical piece.

The necessary key terms to define writing, editing, and composing: audience, composition, context, design, and purpose. These key terms provide me with a fuller definition of writing, editing, and composing because they are the sum of all of its parts. Those key words are necessary in order to understand the purpose of the rhetorical piece. My experience with project two greatly influenced my definition of composition. Being introduced to assemblage, remix, and remediation emphasized the importance of audience, meaning, and how those two things are influenced by the design of a text. Outside of this course, I have been a lot more theoretical when I am surrounded by rhetoric. I think of all text and their design. Why was it created this way? Who is the intended audience? What is its intended function? Overall, these projects and assignments have made me a lot more critical towards the existence of all text. One specific change I have made is the removal of the word “free” from my theory. Originally, I added free to represent the audience’s freedom to interpret something however they may choose to. While I still think this is important, I have become a lot wearier towards the way that an author’s intended meaning seems to be dominated by the audience. This can be seen through a Reply All podcast about the meme of Pepe the Frog. I am still at the crossroads of this theory where there can be a mutual understanding between audiences and ensuring the text can serve is intended purpose.