From viewing the grid, it is apparent that audience plays a
major role in almost every piece. Although the author’s view of audience may
differ, the viewer comes up in every work. I cannot think of an author who doesn’t
direct this topic. Even if they don’t say “audience,” they still mention the
rhetoric of their work or the effect they want their work to have on a given
population.
I can also view on the grid that there is a big emphasis on
responsiveness. This comes in many different forms. Circulation is a response
to a text, and so is an audience. Even an author can be viewed as a response to
an exigence, which we see in Bitzer and further see an example of this in Arola
and Arola. Estrem goes into detail of how writing is conversational, and is
constantly a response.
A major question I have is if it’s okay to use terms interchangeably
like I did above. Can we generalize terms? And is this how we are able to
create the theory of composing?
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.